HomeTrade InformationSupport Our WorkContact
spacer spacer

MN Senate Candidates Respond to Fair Trade Commitments

The Minnesota Fair Trade Coalition sent out letters requesting all MN Senate Candidates to respond to a series of commitments supporting fair trade policy. Both DFL Senate Candidates Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer and Al Franken sent their response,  commiting to be strong leaders for fair trade policy.  Unfortunately Norm Coleman declined to send any response to our letter. 

Among their commitments, both candidate pledged to oppose Fast Track trade negotiation process, ensure that ILO core labor standardds will be adopted and enforced in future trade deals, and support a full review of existing NAFTA-style trade deals.  Below is the complete list of commitments we asked of all Senate candidates and their response. 

The following is for informational purposes only. The Minnesota Fair Trade Coalition does not support nor indorse any candidate running for public office and has no intention to do so in the future. 

1.       Commit to strengthening Congress’s role in trade policy, by replacing the Fast Track negotiating process with a new system that includes readiness criteria to determine appropriate negotiating partners; binding obligations regarding what must and must not be in future trade agreements; the right of prior informed consent for states before they are bound to non-trade, investment, service sector and procurement rules in trade agreements; and the right for Congress to vote before agreements are signed.  

2.        Commit that all agreements negotiated under their presidency would meet the following criteria:  

a.       Trade agreements must incorporate requirements to adopt into domestic law and enforce the five basic internationally-recognized core labor rights as stated in the eight fundamental International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions dealing with freedom of association; the right to organize and bargain collectively; the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor; the effective abolition of child labor; the elimination of the worst forms of child labor; and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. Failing to meet such standards must be subject to the same dispute resolution and enforcement mechanisms and penalties that apply to the commercial provisions of the trade agreements.  

b.       Trade agreements must allow nations to follow environmental, health and safety standards adopted in reliance on the precautionary principle, recognizing the legitimate rights of governments to protect public health, safety and the environment. Trade agreements must incorporate requirements to adopt into domestic law and enforce the major Multilateral Environmental Agreements, which comprise the global consensus on basic environmental protection. Failing to meet such standards must be subject to the same dispute resolution and enforcement mechanisms and penalties that apply to the commercial provisions of the trade agreements.  

c.       Foreign investors must not be given the right to sue governments directly under trade agreements. The investor privileges included in most trade agreements expose our domestic environmental, public health, zoning and other public interest laws to potential challenge by foreign corporations in secret tribunals. Trade agreements must not allow private investors and corporations to compel governments to pay compensation for the costs of complying with laws, regulations, or other policies to protect the public welfare.  

d.      Trade agreements must not limit our ability to ensure that both imported and domestic products meet US safety standards, nor should they limit the rate of border inspection of imported goods.  

e.       Trade agreements should not require the privatization or deregulation of essential services, including education, health care, construction, transportation, water supply and energy.  

f.        Procurement provisions in trade agreements must not undermine the ability of federal and state governments to use tax dollars to create and maintain good jobs, to promote economic opportunity and development, and to achieve other important social goals, including safeguarding prevailing wage, renewable energy, and recycled content.  

g.        Trade agreements must allow citizens in America and elsewhere to regain control of farm and food policy with the intent of creating a sustainable family farm system and a safe and healthy food supply. No trade agreement should impede the right of America, or other nations, to devise farm and food policy that establishes fair farm prices, creates a food security reserve, establishes conservation set-asides to avoid wasteful overproduction, makes loans to help farmers own their own land and adopt sustainable farming practices, and meets other social and environmental goals.    

h.      Trade agreements must not undermine U.S. trade laws, including the ability of governments to safeguard domestic industries against market surges and unfair foreign trade practices, such as predatory pricing, currency manipulation, and export dumping. Trade agreements should not prevent governments from regulating the flow of speculative capital.  

i.          Trade agreements must not impede nations’ ability to make affordable pharmaceuticals available to their residents. Provisions in international agreements (including trade agreements) concerning intellectual property rights must recognize and reaffirm that profits from pharmaceutical and biotechnology products should be shared equitably with nations providing the genetic resources upon which such biotechnology products are derived. Trade agreements should also recognize that nations may regulate genetically modified organisms to address food supply and biodiversity conservation.  

3.       Commit to review and assess NAFTA and other bilateral trade agreements, particularly their impact on our jobs, wages, working conditions, environment, consumer safety and democratic protections. Such a review must include recommendations on how to address problems in existing agreements, up to and including renegotiation.  

4.       Commit to oppose the current direction of the WTO “Doha Round” and to call for a new direction in global trade talks to prioritize protections for workers, the poor, health and the environment, and to ensure that global trade rules do not undermine the ability of governments to regulate in the public interest.  

5.        Commit to strengthen and effectively enforce U.S. trade laws to protect U.S. jobs and our manufacturing base.  

6.        Commit to implementing emergency policies to bring our trade deficit into balance, including by addressing currency manipulation, eliminating tax breaks for offshoring production, and exploring other options, such as an import surcharge.  

Al Franken's Response  

1. I oppose Fast Track trade negotiation – Congress must be able to debate and vote on future trade agreements.  We need more oversight over the enforcement of trade agreements, and we definitely need more open and public debate on the front end, before they’re ratified.

2. I’ll stand against any agreement that does not meet these standards.

3. I would absolutely support a review of NAFTA and other trade agreements.  I agree that the reviews must include recommendations on how to improve the agreements and fix the problems they have caused, and I am open to those recommendations including a renegotiation of said agreements. 

4. I am deeply concerned about the current direction of the “Doha Round.”  I will demand that trade talks include strong, enforceable safety, environmental, and labor standards.  I believe that we should not undermine our government’s ability to regulate in the public interest by entering agreements that may limit our rights to do so.

5. I will do everything I can to enforce U.S. trade laws to protect U.S. jobs and our manufacturing base.

6. I am deeply concerned about our balance of trade and will work hard to correct it.  I strongly support eliminating tax breaks for off-shoring production and addressing currency manipulation, and would be happy to consider other options as well.  

 

Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer's Response

I have long been a critic of IMF and World Bank structural adjustment programs, NAFTA and other so-called free trade agreements, and the institutionalization of unfair trade terms through the World Trade Organization.  I come to my views based on decades of work on hunger and poverty issues and my work in Central America .  I fully agree with the Minnesota Fair Trade Coalition’s assessment that “we need an entirely new set of rules and institutions.” I am pleased to tell you that I am in full agreement with the positions you have articulated.  Specifically I share your views that:   

·         Congress must reject a “Fast Track” negotiating process and be fully engaged in trade negotiations from beginning to end;

·         The five basic demands of the ILO Conventions must be built into domestic law and enforced. 

·         Trade agreements must allow nations to uphold environmental, health and safety standards;

·         Foreign investors must not have the right to sue governments directly;

·         Trade agreements must ensure that domestic and foreign goods meet safety standards;

·         We cannot allow privatization or deregulation of essential services;

·         Procurement provisions should not impede federal, state and local governments from using tax dollars to bolster local economies;

·         No trade agreement should be allowed to undermine national efforts to achieve food security and a sustainable agricultural system;

·         Trade agreements should not undermine US trade laws;

·         Trade agreements should not undermine efforts to make pharmaceutical products affordable.  

I also share your commitment to reassess and revise existing trade agreements, to strengthen US trade laws, and to take steps to reduce our nation’s unsustainable and damaging trade deficits.   

Finally, I have been a critic of U.S. policies towards repressive governments in Colombia for many years.  Colombia ’s use and abuse of paramilitary groups to repress social change movements, kill union workers and other social reformers is well documented.  It reminds me eerily of the repressive program instituted by the United States in El Salvador during the 1980s in which responsibility for human rights atrocities were denied or deflected onto paramilitary groups with close ties to US-backed governments.  I am absolutely opposed to the Colombia Free Trade Agreement because more union workers have been killed in Colombia in the past decade than in any other country in the world.  

 

Art by Ricardo Levins-Morales. Check out more great local social justice art at the Northland Poster Collective.  1613 East Lake Street, Minneapolis MN 55407